Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 has an overall score of 79.8, which is slightly better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. Moto Z4's construction is a lot newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a little faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has more CPU cores. Moto Z4 shoots better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments, a larger sensor and a much higher resolution back camera.
The HTC U Ultra features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Moto Z4, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z4 has better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Moto Z4 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.