Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than HTC U Ultra, with an 84.7 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is way newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much better screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much more mega pixels camera.
HTC U Ultra has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.