Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is much better than HTC U Ultra, with a score of 84.9 against 77. Even though Galaxy A80 is newer than HTC U Ultra, it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The HTC U Ultra has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A80 counts with a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A80 captures clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.