Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. The Galaxy A90 5G construction is notably newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A90 5G features a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density. The HTC U Ultra has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.