Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-02-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Even though Galaxy C9 Pro and the HTC U Ultra were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy C9 Pro design is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier. HTC U Ultra has a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.