Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-21 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy M30s's body is a lot newer than HTC U Ultra's, although it is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s takes much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.