Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and notably thinner phone than HTC U Ultra, although it's heavier. The HTC U Ultra features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and lesser RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a much larger screen and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC U Ultra, because it has a way bigger camera sensor, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U Ultra. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.