Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The vivo X60 Pro design is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but just a little heavier than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cores.
Vivo X60 Pro features a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X60 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way more MP back camera, a larger sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.