Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than HTC U Ultra. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a display that's just as good as the display in HTC U Ultra, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little less pixels per screen inch and a little bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with more storage to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has improved battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.