Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the HTC U11 EYEs, getting a global score of 77.8 against 76.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is newer and extremely thinner, but somewhat heavier than HTC U11 EYEs. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro works with Android 14 operating system, and HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a way larger display and a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
HTC U11 EYEs counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better video resolution and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery life than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.