Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the HTC U11 EYEs's score of 76.9. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the HTC U11 EYEs were only released 7 months apart, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is just a bit thicker but just a little lighter than the HTC U11 EYEs. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better hardware performance than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better screen than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with higher video frame rate.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior battery life than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3930mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.