Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the HTC U11 life, with a global score of 83.7 against 74.5. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is newer, but much heavier and a little bit thicker than HTC U11 life. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than HTC U11 life, because it has a bigger display, a greater screen density and a way higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features a little better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a way less mega pixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low-light photography. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 54% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.