Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the HTC U11 life, having a 79.7 score against 74.5. Even though the Moto G Stylus is noticeably newer than the HTC U11 life, it is noticeably heavier and thicker. HTC U11 life counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G Stylus, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The HTC U11 life has a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch. The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes better photographs and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Moto G Stylus has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.