Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is better than the HTC U11 life, getting a score of 82.3 against 74.5. Galaxy A60 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than HTC U11 life, although it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a processor that is very similar to the HTC U11 life one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has 3 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The HTC U11 life has a little sharper display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen. HTC U11 life has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has greater battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has a 31% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.