Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the HTC U11 life, getting a general score of 91.8 against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a much heavier phone than HTC U11 life, but they are equally thin. Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 life has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U11 life, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much longer battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 73% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit more expensive than HTC U11 life, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.