Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-05-18 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is better than the HTC U11, with an 86.6 score against 77.6. The iPhone SE (2022) body is notably newer, lighter and just a little bit thinner than HTC U11. The iPhone SE (2022) features a faster processing unit than HTC U11, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit processor.
HTC U11 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way higher amount of pixels per inch of display, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. HTC U11 counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U11 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
HTC U11 and iPhone SE (2022) count with quite similar cameras, because although the iPhone SE (2022) has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back camera, it also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
HTC U11 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2018mAh.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.