Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-05-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a bit better than the HTC U11, having a overall score of 84.5 against 77.6. The iPhone XS Max construction is newer and a little thinner than the HTC U11's, although it's somewhat heavier. IPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, it also counts with a bigger display.
The HTC U11 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U11 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U11, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a little longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 3179mAh battery size. The iPhone XS Max shoots a little bit better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone XS Max also counts with faster video frame rates.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC U11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the HTC U11, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.