Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2017-05-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is slightly better than the LG V20, having a 77.6 score against 77. The HTC U11 design is just a little lighter but a little bit thicker than the LG V20, and both were released with only 8 months difference. HTC U11 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the HTC U11 also has more CPU cores.
HTC U11 counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the HTC U11 also counts with a quite higher display density. LG V20 features a camera that is very similar to HTC U11's camera, because although the LG V20 has a tinier camera aperture and a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG V20 features a superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V20 features just a little better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy HTC U11, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.