Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the HTC U11, with an 83.7 score against 77.6. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer, but a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the HTC U11. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than HTC U11, because it has a little higher pixel density, a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage for games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega pixels and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.