Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. The Motorola Edge 50 is a a bit heavier cellphone than the HTC U11, but both of them have the same thickness. The HTC U11 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little more vivid screen than HTC U11, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.