Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is a bit better than HTC U11, getting a 79.9 score against 77.6. Although the OPPO Find X3 Pro is noticeably newer than HTC U11, it is heavier and a little thicker. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3216 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate, a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.