Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the HTC U11, having a score of 84.7 against 77.6. Galaxy A32's construction is extremely newer than HTC U11's, but it's thicker and heavier. HTC U11 features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
The HTC U11 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A32 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A32 captures clearer photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.