Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-05-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than the HTC U11's general score of 77.6. The Galaxy A90 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the HTC U11, but it's a little thicker and heavier. Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.