Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's overall score of 77.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is notably newer and much thinner, but way heavier than HTC U11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The HTC U11 counts with a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than HTC U11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy HTC U11, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.