Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. Vivo X60 Pro's body is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC U11's, although it is also a little bit heavier. HTC U11 features a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and higher video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.