Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.48 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8627 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 35.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the HTC Windows Phone 8S, with a score of 83.8 against 57.2. The Galaxy A50 body is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than the HTC Windows Phone 8S. Galaxy A50 counts with a brighter screen than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a lot larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a faster processing unit than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3,5 GB more RAM and more cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has 112 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior camera than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a way larger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations, a way better video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera. The Galaxy A50 has a very superior battery performance than HTC Windows Phone 8S, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1700mAh.
The Galaxy A50 costs a little more than HTC Windows Phone 8S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.