Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 10 |
| 2012-09-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.21 x 2.61 x 0.40 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and Yellow | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 569.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | OLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 290 hours standby time 11.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is a lot better than HTC Windows Phone 8X's 65.7 overall score. Motorola edge comes with Android 10 OS, and HTC Windows Phone 8X has Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS. The Motorola edge design is newer and just a little bit thinner than HTC Windows Phone 8X's, although it is extremely heavier.
HTC Windows Phone 8X has a little sharper display than Motorola edge, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a little lower pixel density and a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Motorola edge features a quite superior hardware performance than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory.
Motorola edge features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 240 GB more internal memory. Motorola edge has a way better battery performance than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
Motorola edge features a very superior camera than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola edge is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.