Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.7 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1, 8 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-09-19 | 2020-06-12 |
| 5.21 x 2.61 x 0.40 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and Yellow | Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 569.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 342 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 290 hours standby time 11.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Fast has an overall score of 72.2, which is slightly better than the HTC Windows Phone 8X's score of 65.7. Even though the Motorola Moto G Fast is much heavier than the HTC Windows Phone 8X, it's somewhat thinner and also way newer. The Motorola Moto G Fast has Android 11 OS, while HTC Windows Phone 8X has Windows Phone 8.1, 8 OS.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a bit superior processor than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. HTC Windows Phone 8X counts with a better display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1280 x 720 resolution, it also counts with a better screen density.
Moto G Fast features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a superior camera than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better (4K) video quality.
Motorola Moto G Fast has a superior battery life than HTC Windows Phone 8X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1800mAh.
Moto G Fast not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.