Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design has a global score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. The Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design is an a lot older and incredibly thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Huawei made it somewhat lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides some additional features and a performance increase.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has a much bigger display, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a little bit higher display pixel density. The Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design counts with a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a much better video definition.
Huawei Mate 10 Porsche Design not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.