Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-11-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.07 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Brown, Gray and Pink | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 10 Pro has an overall score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Huawei Mate 10 Pro construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's notably thicker and was released many years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot larger display.
The Huawei Mate 10 Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution, a way better video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Huawei Mate 10 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.