Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.93 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Gold and Pink | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 239.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 498 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 730 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP12 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 10 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a score of 78.9 against 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Huawei Mate 10 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Huawei Mate 10 is way older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
Huawei Mate 10 features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a way brighter display, a lot larger display and a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Huawei Mate 10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with a way better resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 10, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
The Huawei Mate 10 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.