Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Emerald green and Twilight | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.08 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Although the Huawei Mate 20 Pro is way older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has a more mega pixels back camera, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments, a way larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.