Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Mystic silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2772 x 1334 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 452 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G78 MP24 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a general score of 90.9, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Huawei Mate 40 Pro has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro design is a little bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is notably thicker and was released 4 years before.
Huawei Mate 40 Pro features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Huawei Mate 40 Pro, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Huawei Mate 40 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Huawei Mate 40 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery life than Huawei Mate 40 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.