Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing you a couple nice extra features. Although Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design is a lot older and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still much lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a lot larger display and a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has a back camera with way more MP, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher video quality and a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Huawei Mate 9 Porsche Design, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.