Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.98 x 2.95 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 775.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 9 Pro has an overall score of 78.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though the Huawei Mate 9 Pro is notably older and noticeably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a lot lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Huawei Mate 9 Pro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it offers a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Huawei Mate 9 Pro features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery life than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Huawei Mate 9 Pro, because it has a way higher video definition, a lot more MP back camera, a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot bigger aperture.
Huawei Mate 9 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.