Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-01-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.18 x 3.11 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Brown, Gold, Gray, Silver and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than Huawei Mate 9's 73.4 global score. The Galaxy A32 body is much newer, but just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Huawei Mate 9. The Huawei Mate 9 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Huawei Mate 9 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a higher display density. The Galaxy A32 has a greater camera than Huawei Mate 9, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Huawei Mate 9, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has greater battery life than Huawei Mate 9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.