Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.35 x 5.76 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 10.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Interstellar blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate Xs is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 91.6 score against 77.8. Although it's the best in this comparison, Huawei Mate Xs is a notably older, notably thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Huawei Mate Xs. Both have the same resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, the same display density and a same size screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Huawei Mate Xs, both have exactly the same 512 GB internal storage capacity. Huawei Mate Xs has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Huawei Mate Xs, because it has a way higher video quality, a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera in the back with more MP.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery life than Huawei Mate Xs, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.