Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.91 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than the Karbonn S2 Titanium, having a overall score of 83.3 against 46.3. The Samsung Galaxy S9 construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Karbonn S2 Titanium. The Galaxy S9 has a quite superior hardware performance than Karbonn S2 Titanium, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features an incredibly better screen than Karbonn S2 Titanium, because it has way more pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Galaxy S9 captures much clearer photos and videos than Karbonn S2 Titanium, because it has a way higher 12 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Karbonn S2 Titanium, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior battery duration than Karbonn S2 Titanium, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than the Karbonn S2 Titanium, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.