Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is much better than Karbonn S7 Titanium's 53.1 general score. The Google Pixel 3 is a thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the Karbonn S7 Titanium. The Google Pixel 3 features a quite superior hardware performance than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Karbonn S7 Titanium has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density. Google Pixel 3 has a very superior camera than Karbonn S7 Titanium, although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 features a much better battery lifetime than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more than Karbonn S7 Titanium, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.