Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is way better than the Karbonn S7 Titanium, having a score of 83.3 against 53.1. Galaxy S9's construction is just a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Karbonn S7 Titanium. The Galaxy S9 has a better hardware performance than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Karbonn S7 Titanium has a slightly better display than Galaxy S9, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a just a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better camera than Karbonn S7 Titanium, although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S9 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much longer battery performance than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a little more expensive than the Karbonn S7 Titanium, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.