Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a global score of 78.2, which is way better than the Karbonn S7 Titanium's general score of 53.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a newer 10 version while Karbonn S7 Titanium has Android 4.2. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Poco M3 construction is much heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Karbonn S7 Titanium.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a little bit better processing power than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has 3 GB more RAM and 4 more cores. Karbonn S7 Titanium features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 takes way better videos and photos than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior battery duration than Karbonn S7 Titanium, because it has a 200% more battery size.
Xiaomi Poco M3 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.