Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 46.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.89 x 2.53 x 0.40 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Karbonn Smart A12 Star, getting a score of 80.7 against 46.5. The Galaxy Note 3 is a much heavier but somewhat thinner cellphone than Karbonn Smart A12 Star. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version while Karbonn Smart A12 Star has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a more vivid display than Karbonn Smart A12 Star, because it has a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a lot larger display and a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a better performing processing unit than Karbonn Smart A12 Star, because it has 2,5 GB more RAM memory, an additional GPU and more processing cores.
The Galaxy Note 3 takes much better pictures and videos than Karbonn Smart A12 Star, because it has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy Note 3 features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Karbonn Smart A12 Star, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 64 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better battery performance than Karbonn Smart A12 Star, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.