Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.06 x 3.02 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6591 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2050mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than the Karbonn Titanium Hexa, with an 82.5 score against 54.6. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL's design is heavier and thicker than the Karbonn Titanium Hexa. The Karbonn Titanium Hexa has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a quite smaller display and a lot lower display density.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better processing power than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior battery performance than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior camera than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Karbonn Titanium Hexa, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.