Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.02 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6591 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2050mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, having an 80 score against 54.6. Google Pixel 3 is a a little heavier and thicker phone than the Karbonn Titanium Hexa. The Karbonn Titanium Hexa counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, although it has a quite lower pixel count per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, they both have a screen of the same size.
Google Pixel 3 has a better performing CPU than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much better camera than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition. Google Pixel 3 features a much longer battery performance than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2050mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.