Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.06 x 3.02 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6591 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2050mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is way better than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, having a 78.2 score against 54.6. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a noticeably heavier and notably thicker cellphone than Karbonn Titanium Hexa. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco M3 has 10 version while Karbonn Titanium Hexa has Android 4.4.2.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and 7 more processing cores. Karbonn Titanium Hexa features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity per display inch.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 captures much better pictures and videos than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better battery duration than Karbonn Titanium Hexa, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.