Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 56.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.80 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 80.7, which is way better than the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus's 56.8 overall score. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, Galaxy Note 3 is a heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version while Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus has Android 4.4.2.
Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, because it has 48 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows up to 64 GB.
Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus also counts with a much better graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 captures much better videos and photos than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 13 megapixels resolution.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.