Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-04-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.80 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a lot better than the Karbonn Titanium Octane's 54.4 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a extremely newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Karbonn Titanium Octane, although it is also heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a much greater display pixels density, a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a camera with more MP. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Karbonn Titanium Octane, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.