Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-04-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.80 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is way better than the Karbonn Titanium Octane's 54.4 overall score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note 3 design is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Karbonn Titanium Octane. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a more recent 5.0 version and Karbonn Titanium Octane has Android 4.4.2, offering some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a greater display density and a quite larger screen. Galaxy Note 3's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Karbonn Titanium Octane, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a worse 600 MHz graphics processing unit, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, it also counts with more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Karbonn Titanium Octane. Both have a 13 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 64 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.