Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-08-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.84 x 2.80 x 0.51 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 8.10 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 182.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3240mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is way better than Kyocera DuraForce Pro's general score of 63.1. Motorola Droid Turbo's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, even though it was released about 22 months before. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Motorola Droid Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while Kyocera DuraForce Pro has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking screen than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a higher pixel density and a little bit bigger screen. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Kyocera DuraForce Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a faster processing unit than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Droid Turbo has longer battery duration than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3240mAh.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Pro, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Kyocera DuraForce Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.