Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is much better than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, with an 81.6 score against 72.2. Google Pixel 2 is an much older cellphone than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but it is thinner and extremely lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 has a screen that is very similar to Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's display, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density.
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 2 takes much clearer photos and videos than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a worse video quality and a back-facing camera with way less MP, they both have the same camera aperture.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.